Jones v. Johnson & Wales University
Plaintiff: Dorran M. Jones
Defendant: Johnson & Wales University
Case Number: 1:2008cv00476
Filed: December 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: Lincoln D. Almond
Presiding Judge: Mary M Lisi
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 46 Report and Recommendations.- So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M Lisi on 9/9/10. (Barletta, Barbara)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Johnson & Wales University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorran M. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Wales University
Represented By: Joseph D. Whelan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?