Jones v. Johnson & Wales University
Dorran M. Jones |
Johnson & Wales University |
1:2008cv00476 |
December 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D. Almond |
Mary M Lisi |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 46 Report and Recommendations.- So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M Lisi on 9/9/10. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Johnson & Wales University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dorran M. Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Johnson & Wales University | |
Represented By: | Joseph D. Whelan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.