Parrillo v. Oscient Pharmaceuticals et al
Plaintiff: James Parrillo
Defendant: Oscient Pharmaceuticals and Jacquelyn Plank
Case Number: 1:2009cv00111
Filed: March 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Assault Libel & Slander Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Presiding Judge: David L. Martin
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parrillo v. Oscient Pharmaceuticals et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Parrillo
Represented By: Daniel P. McKiernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oscient Pharmaceuticals
Represented By: Walter C. Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacquelyn Plank
Represented By: Walter C. Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?