Verizon New England, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 2322 et al
Verizon New England, Inc. |
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 2323 |
1:2009cv00179 |
April 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office |
XX US, Outside State |
David L. Martin |
Mary M Lisi |
None |
Federal Question |
29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Verizon New England, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 2322 et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Verizon New England, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Arthur G. Telegen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 2323 | |
Represented By: | Sheilah F. McCarthy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.