Masse v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Bernard Masse
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 1:2010cv00134
Filed: March 18, 2010
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
Presiding Judge: Mary M Lisi
Referring Judge: David L. Martin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 14, 2011 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 14 Report and Recommendations, denying 9 Motion to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner filed by Bernard Masse, granting 13 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Michael J Astrue, - So Ordered by Judge John J McConnell, Jr on 7/14/11. (Barletta, Barbara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Masse v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Masse
Represented By: Paul A Dinsmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?