Paiva v. Bansal et al
| Richard Lee Paiva |
| Tej Bansal and Jose Arias |
| 1:2010cv00179 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| William E Smith |
| Jacob Hagopian |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 94 Motion for Summary Judgment- So Ordered by Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 4/3/12. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER adopting 81 Report and Recommendation and denying 42 Motion for Declaratory Judgment; denying 17 Motion for TRO; denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction- So Ordered by Judge John J McConnell, Jr on 6/2/11. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Compel; granting 28 Motion to Compel; granting 29 Motion to Compel; granting 30 Motion to Compel; granting 31 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacob Hagopian on 2/17/11. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 32 Motion to Amend the Complaint. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 2/15/11. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jacob Hagopian on 4/27/10. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
