Scorpio v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Rita Scorpio |
Underwriters at Lloyds, London |
Underwriters at Lloyds, London |
Rita Scorpio |
1:2010cv00325 |
August 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Mary M Lisi |
David L. Martin |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Summary Judgment, 24 Motion for Summary Judgment: With respect to the Complaint, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted and Plaintiff's motion for s ummary judgment is denied with respect to the water exclusion provision (part of count I) and Plaintiff's bad faith claim (count III). The motions for summary judgment are denied with respect to coverage under the collapse provision (part of count I), coverage under the loss of rental income provision (part of count I), and the breach of contract claim (count II). With respect to Defendant's counterclaim, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied with respect to the water exclusion provision (counterclaim count I). The motions for summary judgment are denied with respect to coverage under the collapse provision (counterclaim count II) and coverage under the loss of rental income provision (counterclaim count III). So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 6/5/2012. (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.