Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. eNom, Inc. et al
| Amica Mutual Insurance Company |
| Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc., Insurance-Website.com, Darrin Bagnuolo, Darba Enterprises Inc., eNom, Inc. and Hostway Services, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00070 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| Ronald R Lagueux |
| David L. Martin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 118 Bagnuolos Motion For Partial Stay. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 8/2/2013. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
59
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER amending 56 Memorandum and Order: The defendant,Bagnuolo's appeal is denied Magistrate Judge Martin's 49 Memorandum and Order hereby is affirmed and the 50 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopte d by the Court. In addition to the attorneys fees of $2,133.00, which defendant, Bagnuolo was ordered to pay to plaintiff Amica, this Court adds a sanction of $2,000.00 because the appeal and objection are frivolous. Therefore, defendant Bagnuolo shall pay as a sanction the total amount of $4,133.00 to Amica Mutual Insurance Company. Payment shall be made within 21 days of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Ronald R Lagueux on 6/29/2012. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
