KODAR, LLC et al v. United States of America et al
KODAR, LLC, Phoenix Aviation Managers and Old Republic Insurance Company |
United States of America and Stuart Gitlow |
1:2011cv00119 |
March 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D. Almond |
Mary M Lisi |
Airplane |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached order, the FAA's 33 motion for partial dismissal of Gitlow's 22 amended cross claim is GRANTED and Count III of that claim is DISMISSED. The FAA's 33 motion to dismi ss Global's 21 third-party complaint is GRANTED and that complaint is DISMISSED as well. Darche's 35 motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Gitlow's personal injury claims against Darche and that claim i s DISMISSED. Gitlow's 42 motion to amend/correct his Third-Party Complaint is GRANTED with respect to indemnification and contribution claims against Darche and otherwise DENIED. Global's 40 motion to intervene is DENIED. In light of this Court's determination regarding Darche's 35 motion for partial summary judgment, Darche's 46 motion for an extension of time to file an Statement of Undisputed Facts nunc pro tunc is DENIED as moot. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 6/6/2012. (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.