Mejia v. Smith et al
Edward Mejia |
William E. Smith, Bryan Murphy, Captain Samuels, Sergeant Santos, Sergeant CK Cloud and Officer Pagent |
1:2012cv00449 |
June 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Ronald R. Lagueux |
David L. Martin |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER granting the remaining Defendants' 42 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts VIII, IX, X, and XI, which are the only remaining claims in this case. -- The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (New Hampshire) on 2/11/2014. (A copy of the attached Order was forwarded to Plaintiff via first-class mail on 2/12/2014.)(Duhamel, John) |
Filing 64 ORDER re 57 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, 58 Declaration filed by Edward Mejia: Mejia's 58 request for more time to conduct discovery under Rule 56(d) is not properly supported and is DENIED. Mejia's 57 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. -- Mejia shall filed his objection or response to the Defendants' 42 motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment on or before Friday, JANUARY 17, 2014. If Mejia should fail to file an objection or respon se to the pending motion within the time allowed, the Court will consider the motion unopposed and the properly supported facts in the motion will be deemed to be admitted by Mejia. So Ordered by Judge Joseph DiClerico (New Hampshire) on 1/3/2014. (A copy of this Order was forwarded via first class mail to Plaintiff Mejia on November 25, 2013.) (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 55 ORDER: DENYING 44 Motion to Stay. -- DENYING to the extent that Defendants have already produced the requested materials, DEFERRING as to the requested WDF records, pending Defendants' counsel's report to the Court at the 11/20/2013 sche duling conference regarding the availability of those records, GRANTING in all other respects 46 Motion for Discovery. -- DENYING 49 Motion for Protective Order. -- The Defendants' request contained in its 52 proposed discovery plan co ncerning limitations on its obligation to preserve potential evidence in this case is DENIED. -- Defendants must serve Plaintiff with responses or specific objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests, and answers or specific objections to Plain tiff's previously propounded interrogatories, within 14 days of the date of this Order. -- Appendix A (Federal Rules re motions for summary judgment) & Appendix B (Local Rules re motons for summary judgment) attached.-- So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B McCafferty (New Hampshire) on 11/12/2013. -- (A copy of the attached Order was forwarded to Mr. Mejia via first-class mail on November 12, 2013.) (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 37 ORDER: Count I (Mejia's claim against Judge William E. Smith) is DISMISSED. Counts VIII, IX, X, and XI (as to "unknown marshals") remain in the case, pending service on the marshal defendants as directed in the attached order. -- Pl aintiff has 60 days from the date of this order (that is, by May 20, 2013) to provide the names and the appropriate address for service of the unknown marshals to the clerk's office. (Plaintiff is further instructed that all future pleadings, motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or their attorney(s) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)). So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. (NH) on 3/21/2013. (Duhamel, John) Modified on 3/22/2013 to note that a copy of the instant order was forwarded to Plaintiff via first-class mail on 3/22/2013 to Plaintiff's address as listed on the docket. (Duhamel, John). |
Filing 29 ORDER granting Defendants' 28 Motion to Dismiss Complaint as to Counts II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII. So Ordered by Judge Joseph DiClerico (New Hampshire, sitting by designation) on 12/17/2012. (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.