Seguin v. Chafee et al
Mary Seguin |
Lincoln D. Chafee, Steven M. Constantino, Sharon A. Santilli and Paul Suttell |
1:2012cv00708 |
October 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Joseph DiClerico |
Landya B McCafferty |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 REVISED ORDER denying 45 MOTION for Recusal, denying 44 MOTION for Recusal, denying 46 MOTION to Amend/Correct. So Ordered by Judge Joseph DiClerico on 1/9/2013. (Smith, Rana) |
Filing 42 ORDER: The Defendants' motion to dismiss 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and for Lack of Jurisdiction, is granted. All other pending motions are terminated as moot. The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Finding as moot 29 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 32 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 37 Motion for Disclosure; finding as moot 38 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 40 Moti on to Strike ; finding as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 19 Motion to Strike ;finding as moot 21 Motion to Expedite; finding as moot 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 25 Motion for TRO; finding as moot 26 Motion to Disqualify Counsel ; finding as moot 27 Motion to Disqualify Counsel ; finding as moot 27 Motion to Expedite. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. on 12/14/2012. (Smith, Rana) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.