deVillers v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island
Plaintiff: Robert J. deVillers
Defendant: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island
Case Number: 1:2013cv00173
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: Mary M. Lisi
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: 38 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by Robert J. deVillers re 37 Memorandum and Order, 35 Status Report; requesting that the Court allow Plaintiff time "to supply a brief outlining the inadequacies of the amounts paid by BC BS on remand..." -- For the reasons stated in Defendant's Objection and those set forth in the prior orders of this Court, Plaintiff's request to file another brief is DENIED. --. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 8/11/2014. (A copy of the attached Memorandum and Order was forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 8/11/2014.)(Duhamel, John)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: With the payment to Plaintiff of $6736.67, an amount Plaintiff does not contest, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims, to the extent they survived the Magistrate's 33 Report and Recommendations, are now moot. Accordingly, the case is hereby DISMISSED.-- So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 7/22/2014. (A copy of the attached Memorandum and Order was forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 7/22/2014.)(Duhamel, John)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 33 Report and Recommendations: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part affirming its decision that Alternative Youth Care (AYC) was not a covered inpatient residential program and DENIED and REMANDED to the Plan Administrator to further develop the record and make a determination as to whether Plaintiff's son was entitled to coverage, out-of-network or otherwise, for any of the outpatient therapy or counseling services he received while residing at AYC between August 2011 and June 2012. -- (This Court will retain jurisdiction pending Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island's review on remand. Counsel for Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island shall provide the Court and Plaintiff with a status report on or before June 30, 2014.-- So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 3/31/2014. (A copy of this Order was forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 3/31/2014.) (Duhamel, John)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: deVillers v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island
Represented By: Ronald M. LaRocca
Represented By: Michael J. Daly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert J. deVillers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?