Emrit v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers, Sound Exchange and Tunecore, Inc. |
1:2013cv00179 |
March 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D. Almond |
Mary M. Lisi |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting ASCAP's 48 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting TuneCore's 51 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, and finding as moot TuneCore's 51 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Because the Court lacks both federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 8/13/2013. (A copy of this Order was forwarded to Plaintiff via first-class mail on August 13, 2013.) (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendations re 15 Motion to Dismiss, 17 Motion to Dismiss: The 1 Complaint and the 38 First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDUCE with leave to file a second Amended Complaint that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (a) and 10(b), within twenty-one (21) days. So Ordered by Chief Judge Mary M. Lisi on 6/4/2013. (A copy of the instant order was forwarded to Plaintiff via first-class mail on 6/4/2013.) (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.