Cerullo v. Wall
Alec Cerullo |
Ashbel T. Wall |
1:2014cv00364 |
August 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
Lincoln D. Almond |
Mary M. Lisi |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint pursuant to this Court's 11 Memorandum and Order; this matter is therefore DISMISSED. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 4/9/2015. (A copy of the attached Memorandum and Order was forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 4/9/2015.) (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: If Plaintiff so chooses, he may file a second amended complaint as described in the attached document. If he chooses to do so, he shall file his amended complaint ON OR BEFORE APRIL 3, 2015. The Court will then re-screen the amended complaint and will rule on Plaintiff's pending Application to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by that date, the Court will assume that he is no longer interested in pursuing this action and wil l dismiss the Complaint. Plaintiffs 2 Motion for Counsel is DENIED. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 3/16/2015. (A copy of the attached Memorandum and Order, as well as another copy of the Court's 12/18/2014 Memorandum and Order, were forwarded to pro se Plaintiff via first-class mail on 3/16/2015.) (Duhamel, John) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alec Cerullo, 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Alec Cerullo: In its present form Plaintiff's Complaint is incoherent and subject to dismissal for fai lure to state a claim. If Plaintiff so chooses, he may file an amended complaint as described in the attached Memorandum and Order, and he shall file his amended complaint on or before JANUARY 15, 2015. The Court will then re-screen the amended comp laint. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by that date, the Court will assume that he is no longer interested in pursuing this action and will dismiss the Complaint. -- In addition, if Plaintiff decides to proceed with his case and hi s Application to proceed in forma pauperis, he should file a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the 6-month period prior to the filing of the original Complaint on or before JANUARY 15, 2015. The Court will then rule on his Application and Motion for Counsel. So Ordered by Judge Mary M. Lisi on 12/18/2014. (A copy of the attached Memorandum and Order was forwarded to Mr. Cerullo via first-class mail on 12/18/2014.) (Duhamel, John) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cerullo v. Wall | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alec Cerullo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.