Rainsoft v. Macfarland

Plaintiff: Rainsoft
Defendant: Brian MacFarland
Case Number: 1:2015cv00432
Filed: October 15, 2015
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William E. Smith
Referring Judge: Patricia A. Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2018 Opinion or Order 126 OPINION AND ORDER granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 118 Motion for Sanctions. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 9/30/2018. (Jackson, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rainsoft v. Macfarland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rainsoft
Represented By: Mark W. Freel
Represented By: David Michael Friebus
Represented By: Krystle Guillory Tadesse
Represented By: John Michael Touhy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian MacFarland
Represented By: Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr.
Represented By: Mary C. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?