Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 20 Welfare and Benefit Fund et al v. CVS Health Corporation
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 20 Welfare and Benefit Fund and Indiana Carpenters Welfare Fund |
CVS Health Corporation |
1:2016cv00046 |
February 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Providence |
William E. Smith |
Patricia A. Sullivan |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 180 REDACTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (redacted version of Sealed Memorandum and Order, ECF No. 179 in 1:16-cv-0046-WES-PAS and ECF No. 175 in 1:16-cv-00447-WES-PAS). So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 5/11/2021. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00046-WES-PAS, 1:16-cv-00447-WES-PAS(Jackson, Ryan) Modified on 5/18/2021: corrected referred ECF numbers (Jackson, Ryan). |
Filing 80 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 56 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint in case 1:16-cv-00046-WES-PAS and granting (40) Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint in case 1:16-cv-00447-WES-PAS. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 3/31/2018. Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-00046-WES-PAS, 1:16-cv-00447-WES-PAS(Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Certify Question to the Indiana Supreme Court; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 11/1/2016. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.