Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products US et al
| Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. |
| Shell Oil Products US, Shell Oil Company, Shell Petroleum, Inc., Shell Trading (US) Company, Royal Dutch Shell plc and Motiva Enterprises LLC |
| 1:2017cv00396 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| Lincoln D. Almond |
| William E. Smith |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
344
ORDER denying 326 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 5/8/2026. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
342
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting 312 MOTION TO UNSEAL JUDICIAL RECORDS. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 5/7/2026. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
323
ORDER denying 304 Motion for Reconsideration. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/3/2026. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
|
Filing
309
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 283 Motion for Discovery to Challenge Defendants' Confidentiality Designations. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 1/27/2026. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing
301
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 240 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Senior Judge William E. Smith on 12/23/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
279
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 269 Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoena. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 10/3/2025. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing
242
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 224 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 7/14/2025. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing
227
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Shell Defendants' 201 MOTION to Compel Responses to Defendants' Written Discovery Requests; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 202 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 5/29/2025. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing
198
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - For the reasons stated, Plaintiff's Motions are resolved as follows: ECF No. 174 GRANTED; ECF No. 175 DENIED; ECF No. 177 GRANTED in part as to Requests 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 15, and otherwise DENIED; and ECF No. 185 GRANTED in part as to Requests 68, 78, 79, and 85, and otherwise DENIED. 174 Motion to Compel; 175 Motion to Compel; 177 Motion to Compel; and 185 Motion to Compel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 2/14/2025. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 72) and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 78) are both DENIED without prejudice. 72 Motion to Compel; 78 Motion for Protective Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 7/21/2022. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
89
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 70) be DENIED. 70 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Shell Petroleum, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Shell Trading (US) Company. Objections to R&R due by 7/14/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 6/30/2022. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 9/28/2020. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
