Jefferson v. Raimondo et al
| Leonard C. Jefferson |
| Gina Raimondo, Ashbel T. Wall, Barry Weiner, Mathew Kettle, Aceto, Duffy, Amaral, Burt, Paolello, Crowley, Jennifer Clarke and Simon Melnick |
| 1:2017cv00439 |
| September 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| William E. Smith |
| Patricia A. Sullivan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 37 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Mathew Kettle, Barry Weiner, Aceto, Particia Coyne-Fague, Ashbel T. Wall. I recommend that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37) be grante d pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim because of the absence of plausible facts establishing the intentional and unreasonable infliction of a substantial burden on Plaintiffs religious practice. Objections to R&R due by 11/18/2019.. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 11/4/2019. (Saucier, Martha)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendations.; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 8/15/2018. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
