Taylor v. Duffy et al
| Lemuel O. Taylor |
| Officer Crig, Justin Amaral, Captain Duffy, SIU Investigator Figureido, Officer Barber, Particia Coyne-Fague, Officer Bastine, Jeffery Aceto, Officer Marvillie, Officer Craig, Lynne Diggins, Teresa Berube, Officer Porter, Officer Figueroa, Officer Spadoni, Officer Calise and Officer Rodriguez |
| 1:2018cv00436 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Providence Office |
| Providence |
| William E Smith |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Lemuel O. Taylor. Responses due by 8/23/2018. (Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lemuel O. Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Lemuel O. Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint. This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet Unsigned. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day.. Civil Cover Sheet mailed on 8/9/2018. (Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
