Beaulieu-Bedford v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections
| Norman Beaulieu-Bedford |
| Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island |
| 1:2018cv00467 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island. Responses due by 11/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Docket: P1-1997-1715A (Feb. 25, 2011), #2 Exhibit Rhode Island Supreme Court Order dated Nov. 23, 2010, #3 Exhibit Docket: P1-1997-1715A (Oct. 21, 2018), #4 Exhibit Docket: P2-2016-1092A, #5 Exhibit Docket: PM-2016-4043, #6 Exhibit PCR Application dated Aug. 24, 2016, #7 Exhibit Docket: PM-2017-1898, #8 Exhibit PCR Application dated April 27, 2017, #9 Exhibit Docket: PM-2018-4262, #10 Exhibit PCR Application dated June 4, 2018, #11 Exhibit Judgment dated Oct. 12, 2018 (PM-2018-4262))(Bush, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to File Affidavit and Memorandum of Law , filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. Responses due by 11/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Envelope)(Jackson, Kerrie) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. Responses due by 10/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 10 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14670021323 (Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford in support of #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 8
ORDER entered directing the State of Rhode Island to respond State of Rhode Island Response due by 10/21/2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/21/2018. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. After reviewing the Petitioner's inmate account statement, his motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Although he generally alleges various constitutional violations, such claims are conclusory and not presently supported by sufficient factual allegations to state viable civil rights claims under 42 USC sec. 1983. However, the crux of the Petition is a claim that Petitioner is "being illegally detained" (ECF Doc. No. 1 at p. 1) and he "pray[s] for release from unlawful incarceration" (ECF Doc. No. 6 at p. 6). Accordingly, the case is properly treated as one seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 USC sec. 2254, and, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Attorney General is hereby ordered to file its response to this Petition on or before October 21, 2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/21/2018. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford in support of #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . (Attachments: #1 Income Statement, #2 Exhibits, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(Jackson, Kerrie) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford in support of #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff must file the proper documentation concerning his inmate account on or before October 2, 2018 or risk having his Application denied and this matter dismissed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/4/2018. (Noel, Jeannine)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. Regarding New Case: #1 Complaint. (Potter, Carrie) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER entered directing the plaintiff to pay the civil case filing fee in the amount of $400.00 or to file a motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filing Fee or Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis due on or before 9/14/2018. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 8/24/2018. (Potter, Carrie)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER entered directing the plaintiff to pay the civil case filing fee in the amount of $400.00 or to file a motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filing Fee or Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis due on or before 9/14/2018. So Ordered by Chief Judge William E. Smith on 8/24/2018. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Norman Beaulieu-Bedford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Potter, Carrie) |
| CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint. This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet not attached. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day. (Potter, Carrie) |
| CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint. This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet not attached. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day. (Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
