Lachapelle v. Time Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Christina Lachapelle
Defendant: Meredith Corporation and Time Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00535
Filed: September 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Referring Judge: Patricia A Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: I hereby renounce any potential membership I might have as a member of the putative class alleged in this case and waive any claim I might have arising from the allegations asserted in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 10/2/2018. (Saucier, Martha)
September 25, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Meredith Corporation, Time Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number 18-cv-513, 18-cv-520 and 18-cv-534 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1266491 ), filed by Christina Lachapelle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Wasylyk, Peter)
September 25, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Meredith Corporation, Time Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number 18-cv-513, 18-cv-520 and 18-cv-534 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie)
September 25, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1266491 ), filed by Christina Lachapelle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Wasylyk, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lachapelle v. Time Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Lachapelle
Represented By: Peter N. Wasylyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meredith Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?