Swartz v. Aramark Services, Inc. Alias
| Serena Swartz |
| Aramark Services, Inc. Alias and Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership |
| 1:2018cv00654 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| John J McConnell |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Factual Discovery to close by 9/13/2019; Plaintiff's Expert Disclosures shall be made by 10/30/2019; Defendant's Expert Disclosures shall be made by 11/29/2019; Expert Discovery to close by 1/17/2020 and Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 2/21/2020 - So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/16/2019. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
| HEARING CANCELLED: The telephonic rule 16 conference scheduled for Thursday, 1/17/19 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. is cancelled (Barletta, Barbara) |
| Filing 9 RULE 16 STATEMENT by Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership. (Lee, Casey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (Lee, Casey) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sharmili P. Das. So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/9/2019. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Sharmili P. Das to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1309104 ) filed by Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership. (Lee, Casey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Rule 16 Conference set for Thursday, 1/17/2019 at 09:30 AM before District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel shall provide the Clerk with contact information if it differs from the docket sheet. (Barletta, Barbara) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership.(Barletta, Barbara) |
|
TEXT ORDER entering #4 Stipulation to substitute Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership for Aramark Services, Inc.- So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 12/7/2018. (Barletta, Barbara)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES filed by Aramark Services, Inc. Alias. (Lee, Casey) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie) |
| Case assigned to District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC 2018-7672. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0103-1294913, filed by Aramark Services, Inc. Alias. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Removal from Superior Court, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Deft's Ans. to Pltf's Complaint, #5 Exhibit Entry of Appearance, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Casey) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC 2018-7672. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0103-1294913, filed by Aramark Services, Inc. Alias. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Removal from Superior Court, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Deft's Ans. to Pltf's Complaint, #5 Exhibit Entry of Appearance, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
