Salisbury v. Kahn et al
Christopher Salisbury |
Chong Kahn, Bill Hicks, Angelo Casale, Scott Lessins, Avis Evins, Peter Lessins, Paul Lessins, Vivian Evins, Tua Kahn and Al Russo |
1:2019cv00022 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
John J McConnell |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), the Court has reviewed this matter because Plaintiff, Christopher Salisbury has filed a #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this pro se complaint fails to state a claim upon which this Court can grant relief, and because Mr. Salisbury has failed to list his address or other identifying information under out Local Rules (LR Gen. 205), this matter is dismissed without prejudice and the Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees is denied as moot - So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/24/2019. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Salisbury. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Salisbury. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Salisbury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christopher Salisbury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.