Davis v. Drohan et al
| James E. Davis |
| North Providence Police Department, Maureen Drohan, Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, Rhode Island Hospital, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Kathleen Drohan and Providence Police Department |
| 1:2019cv00151 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James E. Davis. (Potter, Carrie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James E. Davis. CLERKS NOTE: Remote electronic access to the document has been restricted by the Clerks Office as it contains one or more personal identifiers. Filer is directed to submit a redacted version. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Potter, Carrie) |
| CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. Related Case Number 19-cv-146 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
