Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. v. Associated Grocers, Inc.
Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. |
Associated Grocers, Inc. |
1:2019cv00316 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
John J McConnell |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 504 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER entering #11 Stipulation to extend time; Reset Deadlines: Associated Grocers, Inc. answer due 9/4/2019 - So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 8/2/2019 (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Requesting 30-day Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Associated Grocers, Inc.. (Techentin, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, extending time to answer or otherwise respond up to and including August 5, 2019 filed by Associated Grocers, Inc.. (Techentin, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey K. Techentin on behalf of Associated Grocers, Inc. (Techentin, Jeffrey) |
TEXT ORDER entering Stipulation (ECF No. #10 ); Associated Grocers, Inc. shall have up to and including 8/5/2019 to file an answer of responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) - So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 7/3/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc. (Sarega, Naomi) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Muller, Chip) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Ryan E. Carreon to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1376213 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Muller, Chip) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Naomi M. Sarega to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1376193 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Muller, Chip) |
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Naomi M. Sarega ; granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Ryan E. Carreon. So Ordered by District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 6/11/2019. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 4 AO FORM 121: REPORT on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Copyright (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 4 AO FORM 121: REPORT on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Copyright (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Associated Grocers, Inc. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Associated Grocers, Inc. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1374958 ), filed by Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Supplement)(Muller, Chip) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1374958 ), filed by Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Supplement)(Muller, Chip) |
Case assigned to District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Case assigned to District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.