Bradbury v. Davol Inc. et al
Tina Bradbury |
Ethicon, Inc., Davol Inc., C.R. Bard Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
1:2019cv00428 |
August 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
William E Smith |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-38) re: MDL #2846: Transferring this matter to the Southern District of Ohio and assignment to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings. So Ordered by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 10/7/2019. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Tina Bradbury. Regarding New Case: #1 Complaint . (Santiago, Jill) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Tina Bradbury. Regarding New Case: #1 Complaint . (Santiago, Jill) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1405870 ), filed by Tina Bradbury.(Santiago, Jill) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1405870 ), filed by Tina Bradbury.(Santiago, Jill) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.