Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group
Defendant: Pamela J Diehl and Victoria L Brown
Case Number: 1:2019cv00444
Filed: August 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Referring Judge: Patricia A Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 CASE PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED Since Chief Judge William E. Smith has determined that this case is in fact related to CA 18-497; this case is permanently assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith for all further proceedings (Jackson, Ryan)
September 11, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE by Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group (Jones, Patrick)
August 23, 2019 Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie)
August 23, 2019 Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie)
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1409234 ), filed by Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Jones, Patrick)
August 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1409234 ), filed by Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Jones, Patrick)
August 23, 2019 CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number 18-cv-497-WES-PAS based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie)
August 23, 2019 CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number 18-cv-497-WES-PAS based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pamela J Diehl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victoria L Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peterson-Puritan Site OU2 Remedial Action Group
Represented By: Patrick T. Jones
Represented By: Ralph R. Liguori
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?