Lee v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee et al
| Darrell Lee |
| Nationwide Mortgage LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| 1:2019cv00457 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1411217 ), filed by Darrell lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ennis, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1411217 ), filed by Darrell lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ennis, John) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
