King v. Wall
Petitioner: Andrew King
Respondent: A.T. Wall and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Case Number: 1:2019cv00645
Filed: December 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: Mary S McElroy
Referring Judge: Patricia A Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Filing 9 RESPONSE In Opposition to #8 MOTION to Withdraw re: #7 MOTION to Withdraw Case Without Prejudice filed by Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island. Replies due by 1/21/2020. (Bush, Christopher)
January 2, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw re: #7 MOTION to Withdraw Case Without Prejudice filed by Andrew King. Responses due by 1/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw Case Without Prejudice - So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 12/27/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
December 26, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw Case Without Prejudice filed by Andrew King. Responses due by 1/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson)
December 16, 2019 Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 14670023186 (Hicks, Alyson)
December 16, 2019 Filing 5 Letter from Andrew King. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Hicks, Alyson)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER entered directing the petitioner to pay the habeas corpus filing fee in the amount of $5.00 or to file a motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filing Fee or Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis due on or before 1/2/2020. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 12/12/2019. (Farrell Pletcher, Paula)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing the State of Rhode Island to respond to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 by 1/10/2020 - So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 12/11/2019. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
December 11, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Hearing filed by Andrew King. Responses due by 12/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson)
December 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC Section 2241, filed by Andrew King. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson)
December 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC Section 2241, filed by Andrew King. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hicks, Alyson)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Wall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A.T. Wall
Represented By: Christopher R. Bush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?