Doreen S. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
1:2020cv00128 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Providence Office |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Reverse, Modify or Remand Decision of the Commissioner to the extent it seeks remand for rehearing; denying 14 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner; declining to adopt 17 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 5/27/2021. (Jackson, Ryan) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse (ECF No. 12) be DENIED and that the Commissioner's Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 14) be GRANTED. Further recommending that Final Judgment enter in favor of the Commiss ioner. 14 MOTION to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Commissioner, Social Security Administration. 12 MOTION to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner with Supporting Memo Objections to R&R due by 11/27/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 11/12/2020. (Noel, Jeannine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Doreen S. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.