in re: Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc.
Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc. |
1:2020cv00328 |
July 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Marine |
46 U.S.C. ยง 741 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION for Order Restraining Suits, Approving Plaintiff's Appraiser's Report, and Directing Issue of Notice and the Filing of Claims filed by Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc.. Responses due by 8/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Notice)(Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1534135 ), filed by Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Blatchley, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: in re: Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: Mataronas Lobster Co, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Samuel P. Blatchley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.