Clements v. Saul
Plaintiff: Marlon Clements
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2021cv00043
Filed: January 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: John J McConnell
Referring Judge: Patricia A Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Reset Deadlines: Andrew M. Saul answer due 5/24/2021 - So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/18/2021. (Barletta, Barbara)
March 16, 2021 Filing 5 Assented MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Andrew M. Saul. Responses due by 3/30/2021. (Nagelberg, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/16/2021: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputin) (Barletta, Barbara).
January 25, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James J. Nagelberg on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Nagelberg, James)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. - So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/25/2021. (Barletta, Barbara)
January 22, 2021 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED.The defendant shall have up to and including 3/23/2021 to enter an appearance and either file a dispositive motion or the Certified Administrative Record which shall be deemed an answer (general denial) to the plaintiff's complaint as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b)(3). (Smith, Rana)
January 22, 2021 Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Smith, Rana)
January 21, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marlon Clements. (Gannon, James)
January 21, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marlon Clements. (Gannon, James)
January 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA, Waived by Statute, or IFP.), filed by Marlon Clements. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Personal Identifier Statement)(Gannon, James)
January 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No fee paid, USA, Waived by Statute, or IFP.), filed by Marlon Clements. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Personal Identifier Statement)(Gannon, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clements v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: James J. Nagelberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlon Clements
Represented By: James J. Gannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?