First Mercury Insurance Company v. The Cadillac Lounge, LLC
First Mercury Insurance Company |
The Cadillac Lounge, LLC |
1:2021cv00106 |
March 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
John J McConnell |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by First Mercury Insurance Company. The Cadillac Lounge, LLC served on 3/17/2021, answer due 4/7/2021. (Carroll, Scott) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to The Cadillac Lounge, LLC. (Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 5 Summons Request filed by First Mercury Insurance Company. (Carroll, Scott) |
CASE PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED: Since Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has determined that this case is in fact related to CA 19-494-JJM this case is permanently assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. for all further proceedings (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Diana Castiov to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1600084 ) filed by First Mercury Insurance Company. (Carroll, Scott) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Kristin V. Gallagher to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number 0103-1600064 ) filed by First Mercury Insurance Company. (Carroll, Scott) |
Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Potter, Carrie) |
CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number CV19-494-JJM-PAS based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (Potter, Carrie) |
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kristin V. Gallagher, ; granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Diana Castiov. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/5/2021. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number 0103-1599737 ), filed by First Mercury Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Carroll, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number 0103-1599737 ), filed by First Mercury Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Carroll, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: First Mercury Insurance Company v. The Cadillac Lounge, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: First Mercury Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Scott M. Carroll |
Represented By: | Kristin V. Gallagher |
Represented By: | Diana Castiov |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Cadillac Lounge, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.