Smith v. Roger Williams Law School et al
Jimmy Smith |
American Bar Association, United States Department of Education, Roger Williams Law School, Olivia Milonas, Jenna Wims Hashway, Francis X Flaherty, Michael Yelonsky, Jonathan Gutoff, William E. Smith, Jared Goldstein and Tanya Monesteir |
1:2021cv00133 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
Paul J Barbadoro |
Andrea K Johnstone |
Mary S McElroy |
Civil Rights: Education |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER: All pending motions are denied without prejudice. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge who shall hold a status conference and establish a schedule for the filing of pretrial motions. The status conference shall be held within the next 7 days. No further motions shall be filed until the status conference is held. - So Ordered by District Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/17/2021. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 31 RESPONSE In Opposition to #19 Amended MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant's, #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants, #14 MOTION For the Clerk to Enter Default , #25 MOTION for Relief filed by United States Department of Education. Replies due by 5/21/2021. (Romero, Amy) |
Filing 30 RESPONSE In Opposition to #29 MOTION for an Extension of Time filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/17/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 29 MOTION for an Extension of Time filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 28 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT by Jimmy Smith in support of #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 27 RESPONSE In Opposition to #25 MOTION for Relief filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/13/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 26 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT by Jimmy Smith in support of #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Relief filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 24 Letter sent to Jimmy Smith requesting that the Process Receipt and Return form (USM-285) and summons be completed in order for the U.S. Marshals Service to effectuate service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). USM -285 form can be found by clicking # here. (Potter, Carrie) |
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The United States Marshals Service is hereby ordered to serve the plaintiffs summons and complaint on the defendants - So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone on 5/6/2021. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE In Opposition to #22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/11/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE In Opposition to #20 MOTION to Strike #18 Response to Motion , #19 Amended MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant's filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/10/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Strike #18 Response to Motion filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 19 Amended MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant's filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit, #3 Email)(McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE In Opposition to #16 MOTION to Dismiss /Strike filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/10/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 17 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT by Jimmy Smith in support of #16 MOTION to Dismiss /Strike. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Email)(McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss /Strike filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Email)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE In Opposition to #14 MOTION For the Clerk to Enter Default filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/7/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 14 MOTION For the Clerk to Enter Default filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Email)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE In Opposition to #12 Amended MOTION to Strike #10 Response to Motion,, filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/7/2021. (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 12 Amended MOTION to Strike #10 Response to Motion,, filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #10 Response to Motion,, filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE In Opposition to #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants (filed by RWU Law School and also on behalf of RWU Law School Affiliated Defendants who have yet to be served with process) filed by Roger Williams Law School. Replies due by 5/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Plaintiff's Request to Waive Service Dated 3/19/21, #2 Exhibit B: RWU Law School's Executed Waiver of Service Dated 4/1/21, #3 Exhibit C: 4/5/21 Communication to Plaintiff Re: Executed Waiver of Service)(Richard, Steven) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants filed by Jimmy Smith. Responses due by 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Email Received)(Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 8 PROCEDURAL ORDER - So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B McCafferty on 4/13/2021. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 7 CONCURRING ORDER accepting this case for referral to the District of New Hampshire for assignment by designation. Case assigned to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro and Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone - So Ordered by Chief Judge Landya B McCafferty on 4/13/2021(Barletta, Barbara) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Paul J. Barbadoro and Magistrate Judge Andrea K Johnstone; District Judge Mary S. McElroy, Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond no longer assigned to the case (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL by all Judges in this District and transferring this case to the District of New Hampshire for assignment by designation -- So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 4/9/2021. (Barletta, Barbara) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against American Bar Association, Roger Williams Law School, United States Department of Education, Jared Goldstein, Tanya Monesteir, Jonathan Gutoff, Olivia Milonas, Jenna Wims Hashway, Michael Yelonsky, William E. Smith, Francis X Flaherty, filed by Jimmy Smith.(Hicks, Alyson) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Richard on behalf of Roger Williams Law School (Richard, Steven) |
Filing 3 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 3 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jimmy Smith. (McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jimmy Smith. (McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jimmy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGuire, Vickie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jimmy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGuire, Vickie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.