Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
Plaintiff: Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and Jarolin Berger
Defendant: Susan Diane Wojcicki, William Henry Gates, Stephane Bancel and Albert Bourla
Case Number: 1:2021cv00451
Filed: November 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: Lincoln D Almond
Referring Judge: William E Smith
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT dismissing Complaint #1 . So Ordered by Clerk of Court on 1/7/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: On December 20, 2021, Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond issued a Report and Recommendation #7 , recommending that Plaintiffs' #1 Complaint be dismissed as frivolous at initial screening. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court has not received an objection. Having carefully reviewed the relevant papers, the Court ACCEPTS the report and ADOPTS the recommendations and reasoning set forth therein. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Complaint #1 is DISMISSED. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 1/7/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and ORDER - Plaintiffs' Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (ECF No. 5) is DENIED. Further, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), I further recommend that Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED. re #1 Complaint filed by Michael Peter, Maria Peter, Jarolin Berger, Julika Berger, #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Peter, Maria Peter, Jarolin Berger, Julika Berger ( Objections to R&R due by 1/3/2022.). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 12/20/2021. (Noel, Jeannine)
December 16, 2021 MOTIONS REFERRED: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
December 14, 2021 Filing 6 Addendum re #1 Complaint by Jarolin Berger, Julika Berger, Maria Peter, Michael Peter. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand)(Kenny, Meghan)
December 14, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by All Plaintiffs. (Kenny, Meghan)
December 14, 2021 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Jarolin Berger, Julika Berger, Maria Peter, Michael Peter. Regarding New Case: #1 Complaint. (Kenny, Meghan) Modified on 12/16/2021 to correct filing date. (Kenny, Meghan).
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER entered directing the plaintiff to pay the civil case filing fee in the amount of $402.00 or to file a motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filing Fee or Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis due on or before 12/3/2021. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 11/12/2021. (Kenny, Meghan)
November 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Maria Peter, Jarolin Berger, Julika Berger, Michael Peter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Kenny, Meghan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Peter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Peter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julika Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jarolin Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Diane Wojcicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Henry Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephane Bancel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert Bourla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?