Bergevine v. Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
Plaintiff: John Bergevine
Defendant: Department of Children, Youth and Families and St. Aluisha's
Case Number: 1:2021cv00459
Filed: November 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Presiding Judge: William E Smith
Referring Judge: Patricia A Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: On December 20, 2021, Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) #3 , recommending that Plaintiff be afforded 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Court has not received an objection. Having carefully reviewed the relevant papers, the Court ACCEPTS the report and ADOPTS the recommendations and reasoning set forth therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff has until February 7, 2022, to move to amend his complaint and attempt to cure the deficiencies identified in the R&R. So Ordered by District Judge William E. Smith on 1/7/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Bergevine, #1 Complaint filed by John Bergevine. I recommend that, if the Court adopts this recommended decision, Plaintiff be afforded thirty days from his receipt of the Courts adoption of this recommendation to file an amended complaint. If he fails to do so, or if the amended pleading fails to state a claim or is otherwise deficient, I recommend that this case be dismissed and his IFP motion be denied as moot. Further, if Plaintiff opts to file an amended complaint, I recommend that the Court also direct him either to file his account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the pleading so that the Court can rule on the merits of his IFP request or to pay the filing fee. Objections to R&R due by 1/3/2022.. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 12/20/2021. (Saucier, Martha)
November 23, 2021 MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Urizandi, Nisshy)
November 19, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Bergevine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla)
November 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by John Bergevine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bergevine v. Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Bergevine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Children, Youth and Families
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Aluisha's
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?