Silvia v. Dunican et al
| David Silvia |
| Patricia Coyne-Fague, Peter F. Neronha, Annmarie Dunican and Attorney General for the State of RI |
| 1:2021cv00472 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| John J McConnell |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/27/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 14 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. #11 Notice of Appeal,,. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Record on Appeal)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by David Silvia. (Attachments: #1 Email)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| USCA Case Number 22-1040 for #11 Notice of Appeal, filed by David Silvia. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND APPELLATE COVER SHEET: Abbreviated record on appeal consisting of notice of appeal, order(s) being appealed, and a certified copy of the district court docket report transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 11.0(b). #11 Notice of Appeal,,. (Attachments: #1 Record on Appeal)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Silvia as to Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel should register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at #http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/. Counsel should also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at # http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf Appeal Record due by 1/18/2022. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 10 DOCKET NOTE: Duplicate received Regarding: #9 MOTION in Objection to Denying Case . (DaCruz, Kayla) |
|
TEXT ORDER denying as moot #9 MOTION in Objection to Denying Case . So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/6/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION in Objection to Denying Case filed by David Silvia. Responses due by 1/19/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
|
TEXT ORDER denying #8 MOTION "objection to dismissing case to request for hearing." The Court accepted the R&R for the reasons stated therein. The case is now dismissed. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/4/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION "objection to dismissing case to request for hearing" re: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,, Order on Report and Recommendations,,, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,, filed by David Silvia. Responses due by 1/18/2022. (Kenny, Meghan) |
|
TEXT ORDER adopting #3 Report and Recommendations; denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying as moot #5 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court has reviewed this case, including the pleadings and the Report and Recommendations ("R&R") from the Magistrate Judge. The Court agrees with the rationale and conclusions contained in the R&R and therefore for those reasons, this matter is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The IFP #2 and the Motion to Amend #5 are denied as moot. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 1/3/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 7 DOCKET NOTE: Duplicate received Regarding: #5 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint . (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 6 Pro Se Consent to Receive Documents Electronically filed by David Silvia. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint filed by David Silvia. Responses due by 12/27/2021. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations filed by David Silvia. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
|
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Silvia, #1 Complaint filed by David Silvia Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2021.., I recommend that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice because there is no subject matter jurisdiction and because it fails to state a claim. In light of this recommendation, I also recommend that Plaintiff's IFP application be denied as moot. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan on 12/9/2021. (Saucier, Martha)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred for determination to Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Jackson, Ryan) |
| CASE PERMANENTLY ASSIGNED Since Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. has determined that this case is in fact related to MC17-14; this case is permanently assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. for all further proceedings (Jackson, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Silvia. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by David Silvia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan Related Case Number 21-cv-259 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
