Bowman v. CVS Health Corporation
| Vonquet Bowman |
| CVS Health Corporation and New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00071 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| John J McConnell |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by CVS Health Corporation, New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC of Agreement By Parties to Settle (Sweeney, Sara) |
TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay until 10/20/22. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 7/20/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 8/2/2022. (Sweeney, Sara) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. CVS Health Corporation answer due 7/19/2022; New Jersey CVS Pharmacy, LLC answer due 7/19/2022. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 7/6/2022. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 9 Third MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer Assented To By Plaintiff filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 7/19/2022. (Sweeney, Sara) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Second MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer Assented To By Plaintiff; CVS Health Corporation answer due 7/5/2022. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 6/21/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 8 Second MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer Assented To By Plaintiff filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 7/5/2022. (Sweeney, Sara) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #7 First MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint Assented To By Plaintiff; CVS Health Corporation answer due 6/20/2022. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 6/8/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Assented To By Plaintiff filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 6/21/2022. (Sweeney, Sara) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT TO JOIN COLLECTIVE ACTION by Vonquet Bowman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT TO JOIN COLLECTIVE ACTION by Vonquet Bowman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CVS Health Corporation. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CVS Health Corporation. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Request filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 3 Summons Request filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Summons Request filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Summons Request filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1722487 ), filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1722487 ), filed by Vonquet Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wasylyk, Peter) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Kenny, Meghan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
