JUUL Labs, Inc. v. EZ Mart Foods of RI Inc.
| JUUL Labs, Inc. |
| EZ Mart Foods of RI Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00216 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| William E Smith |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen D. Lapatin on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JUUL Labs, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Altria Group, Inc. for JUUL Labs, Inc... (Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 Summons Request filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen D. Lapatin on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. Regarding New Case: #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet. (Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 AO FORM 120: REPORT on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 2 AO FORM 120: REPORT on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1763465 ), filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C, #4 Ex. D)(Lapatin, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1763465 ), filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C, #4 Ex. D)(Lapatin, Stephen) |
| CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY: This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet not attached. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day. CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY: This case has been electronically filed and processed, however, after a quality control review the following deficiencies were found: Civil Cover Sheet not attached. The filer is directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet within one day. CORRECTIVE DOCKET ENTRY Regarding: #1 Complaint. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Kenny, Meghan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUUL Labs, Inc. v. EZ Mart Foods of RI Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen D. Lapatin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EZ Mart Foods of RI Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
