Laccinole v. MRS BPO, LLC et al
| Christopher Laccinole |
| MRS BPO, LLC, Saul Freedman and Jeffrey Freedman |
| 1:2022cv00233 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record)(DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing 2
CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
Filing 1
NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County District Court, Case Number 4CA-2022-00278. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ARIDC-1768736, filed by Jeffrey Freedman, Saul Freedman, MRS BPO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 State Court Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Silva, Susan)
|
|
CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. Related Case Number 20-cv-475, and 22-cv-232 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (DaCruz, Kayla).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
