Isijola v. Rhode Island Department of Revenue, et al.
| Femi E. Isijola |
| Rhode Island Department of Revenue, Walter Craddock, Matthew Halstead and Bill Madonna |
| 1:2023cv00060 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| William E Smith |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se Consent to Receive Documents Electronically filed by Femi E. Isijola. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed as Pro Se Electronic Filer filed by Femi E. Isijola. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Femi E. Isijola. Responses due by 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Femi E. Isijola. (Attachments: #1 Motion, Part 2, #2 Affidavit)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Femi E. Isijola. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 USM 285 Forms, #6 Letter)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
