United States Attorneys Office, District of Rhode Island v. Karmue et al
United States Attorneys Office, District of Rhode Island |
Kormahyah Karmue |
MAKOFKA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC. |
1:2023cv00082 |
February 24, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
William E Smith |
Patricia A Sullivan |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment Answer of the Garnishee by MAKOFKA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC.. Objections to Writ Answer due by 4/4/2023. (Makofka, Lester) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Post-Judgment Garnishment & Instructions to the Defendant. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 2 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
CASE CONDITIONALLY ASSIGNED to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. Related Case Number 13cr179 based upon the indication on the cover sheet that a related case previously was assigned to the presiding judge. The assignment is subject to the presiding judge's determination that the cases, in fact, are related. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment , filed by United States Attorneys Office, District of Rhode Island. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Writ, #3 Proposed Clerk's Notice, #4 Government's Notice, #5 Proposed Answer Form, #6 Proposed Request for Hearing Form)(Shah, Milind) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.