McCormick v. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.
| Nicholas McCormick |
| Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc., Fidelity Investments and Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00088 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| Mary S McElroy |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Stay. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 4/18/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 10 Joint RESPONSE In Support to #9 Joint MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Mediation filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.. Replies due by 4/24/2023. (Galindo, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Mediation filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.. Responses due by 5/1/2023. (Galindo, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Kerstin M. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1861447 ) filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.. (Galindo, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Adam M. Meehan to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1861439 ) filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.. (Galindo, Joseph) |
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kerstin M. Miller. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 4/17/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Adam M. Meehan. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 4/17/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. answer due 4/19/2023. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 3/29/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc.. Responses due by 4/11/2023. (Galindo, Joseph) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Set/Reset Deadlines: Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. answer due 3/29/2023. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 3/6/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 5 Assented MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 3/17/2023. (Galindo, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph T. Galindo, Jr on behalf of Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (Galindo, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC-2023-00202. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ARIDC-1845376, filed by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. aka Fidelity Investments, aka Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonald, Sally) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
