Orabona v. Santander Bank, N.A.
| Lorna Orabona |
| Santander Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2023cv00299 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Mary S McElroy |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Assented MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Response to Motion filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 9/26/2023. (Parker, Leslie) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Strike Exhibits in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Lorna Orabona. Responses due by 9/20/2023. (Sylvia, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE In Opposition to #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Lorna Orabona. Replies due by 9/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum)(Sylvia, Jennifer) |
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Set/reset deadlines: Motion to Dismiss -- Responses due by 9/6/2023.. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 7/28/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 6 Assented MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Lorna Orabona. Responses due by 8/8/2023. (Sylvia, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 8/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Parker, Leslie) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Santander Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Santander Holdings USA, Inc., Corporate Parent Banco Santander S.A. for Santander Bank, N.A... (Parker, Leslie) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC-2023-02956. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ARIDC-1891873, filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint and Documents Served in Superior Court Action, #2 Exhibit 2- Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parker, Leslie) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Kenny, Meghan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Orabona v. Santander Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lorna Orabona | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L. Sylvia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Santander Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Celina Marie Andrade |
| Represented By: | Leslie D. Parker |
| Represented By: | Celina M Andrade |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
