Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. v. Kendrick, et al
CONNECTICUT MARINE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a SEA TOW SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT and Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. doing business as Sea Tow Southern Connecticut |
ROGER JOHN KENDRICK, in personam, OCEAN PEARL, a 2011 Oyster 625 Sailing Yacht, and its engine, bunkers, spars, sails, contents and appurtenances, etc., in rem, Roger John Kendrick and Ocean Pearl |
Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. |
1:2023cv00305 |
July 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
Lincoln D Almond |
Mary S McElroy |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MOTION for Countersecurity Pursuant to Rule E(7) of the Supplemental Admiralty Rules filed by Roger John Kendrick, Ocean Pearl. Responses due by 9/26/2023. (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 22 MOTION for Michael Chalos to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1905308 ) filed by Roger John Kendrick, Ocean Pearl. (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Briton Sparkman to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1905287 ) filed by Roger John Kendrick, Ocean Pearl. (Blatchley, Samuel) |
TEXT ORDER granting #22 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Michael Chalos. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/30/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
TEXT ORDER granting #21 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Briton Sparkman. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/30/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Roger John Kendrick, Ocean Pearl re #19 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim (Verified) (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 19 Original ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM (Verified) against Connecticut Marine Services, Inc. by Ocean Pearl, Roger John Kendrick.(Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 18 CLAIM (Verified Statement of Right or Interest) by Ocean Pearl. (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel P. Blatchley on behalf of Roger John Kendrick (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel P. Blatchley on behalf of Ocean Pearl (Blatchley, Samuel) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Consent MOTION CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER REGARDING VESSEL ARREST (On Consent of All Parties). So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/21/2023. (Potter, Carrie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2023: #1 Exhibit A) (Potter, Carrie). |
TEXT ORDER granting nunc pro tunc #13 Motion for Extension of Time. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/21/2023. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 14 Consent MOTION CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER REGARDING VESSEL ARREST (On Consent of All Parties) filed by Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.. Responses due by 8/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" (Letter of Undertaking), #2 (Proposed) Order)(Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 13 MOTION for an Extension of Time (SECOND MOTION SEEKING SEVEN (7) DAY EXTENSION OF RESTRAINING ORDER) (ex parte) filed by Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.. Responses due by 8/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 (Proposed) Order)(Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/1/2023. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appoint Custodian. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/1/2023. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 10 WARRANT FOR MARITIME ARREST IN REM Issued as to Ocean Pearl, 2011 Oyster 625 Sailing Yacht. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Attach. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 8/1/2023. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 8 MOTION for an Extension of Time MOTION SEEKING SEVEN (7) DAY EXTENSION OF RESTRAINING ORDER [Dkt. 5] (Ex-Parte Motion in aid of Maintaining Status Quo) filed by Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.. Responses due by 8/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 (Proposed) Order)(Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Custodian (MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SUBSTITUTE CUSTODIAN WITH INCORPORATED MEMO OF LAW) filed by Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.. Responses due by 8/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Substitute Custodian, #2 (Proposed) Order)(Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Attach (PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF WARRANT FOR MARITIME ARREST IN REM WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW) filed by Connecticut Marine Services, Inc.. Responses due by 8/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 (Proposed) Order, #2 (Proposed) Warrant of Arrest)(Fulweiler, John) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/28/2023) (Potter, Carrie). |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for TRO. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 7/21/2023. (Potter, Carrie) |
Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Filing 3 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (EMERGENCY MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER AND SUPPLEMENTAL PROCESS IN THE FORM OF A RESTRAINING ORDER) filed by CONNECTICUT MARINE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a SEA TOW SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Proposed Order)(Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CONNECTICUT MARINE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a SEA TOW SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT. (Fulweiler, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1893790 ), filed by CONNECTICUT MARINE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a SEA TOW SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Fulweiler, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.