Guo v. Tomkiewicz et al
| Hongnian Guo |
| Brandon Tomkiewicz and Amy Huff-Harris |
| 1:2023cv00342 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| Mary S McElroy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to file Response in Opposition to #15 Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Sur Reply filed by Hongnian Guo. Responses due by 10/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Response in Opposition)(Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE In Opposition to #12 MOTION for Leave to File Document (Sur Reply) filed by Amy Huff-Harris, Brandon Tomkiewicz. Replies due by 10/12/2023. (Storm, Christopher) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Seal Filed. Notice Sent To: Hongnian Guo, Amy Huff-Harris, Brandon Tomkiewicz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Sealed Document- Exhibit to Affidavit #13 )(Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) This entry/document has been filed under seal pursuant to statute, rule or court order and access is restricted. Please login to CM/ECF to view document(s). |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT by Hongnian Guo. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Document filed by Hongnian Guo. Responses due by 10/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Sur-reply, #2 Affidavit)(Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed as Pro Se Electronic Filer filed by Hongnian Guo. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response re #7 Response to Motion to dismiss filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 14 and 15)(Storm, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVITS re #7 Response to Motion by Hongnian Guo. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 1, #2 Affidavit 2, #3 Affidavit 3, #4 Affidavit 4, #5 Affidavit 5, #6 Affidavit 6)(Kenny, Meghan) This document has been filed under seal pursuant to LR Gen 102 and access is restricted. Please login to CM/ECF to view document(s). |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT of #7 Response to Motion, by Hongnian Guo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kenny, Meghan) This document has been filed under seal pursuant to LR Gen 102 and access is restricted. Please login to CM/ECF to view document(s). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE In Opposition to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Hongnian Guo. Replies due by 9/25/2023. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by All Defendants. Responses due by 9/27/2023. (Storm, Christopher) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2023: #1 Supporting Memorandum, #2 Exhibit) (Potter, Carrie). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher C. Storm on behalf of Amy Huff-Harris, Brandon Tomkiewicz (Storm, Christopher) |
| New Case Filing Fee Paid $ 402.00, Receipt Number 100000521 re #1 Complaint filed by Hongnian Guo. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Request filed by Hongnian Guo. (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Kenny, Meghan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00 receipt number 100000514 ), filed by Hongnian Guo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Kenny, Meghan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
