Diaz v. Kane et al
| Samuel Diaz |
| Kimberly Kane, Christopher Cornell, Wayne Salisbury, Carole Dwyer and Kathy Lyons |
| 1:2023cv00355 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| John J McConnell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss: This matter has already been dismissed and closed. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 10/13/2023. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss , re: #1 COMPLAINT filed by Samuel Diaz. Responses due by 10/26/2023. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the matter. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/11/2023. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Samuel Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Samuel Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Samuel Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
