Swint v. UPI News et al
| Robert James Swint |
| UPI News, New York Times, LA Times, Arow Water, Proctor and Gamble, 3M, PanAm, Robert Sylvano and Sylvester Kelly |
| 1:2023cv00392 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Mary S McElroy |
| Patricia A Sullivan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT entered in accordance with Text Order of 9/22/2023. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 9/22/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
| Filing 3 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert James Swint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Robert James Swint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy and Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Sullivan. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
|
Text Order: The Complaint filed by Robert James Swint at #1 is hereby dismissed for failure to state any legally viable claims arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States. Further, the Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis at #2 is denied as moot. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 9/22/2023. (Potter, Carrie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
