Thomas L v. O'Malley
| Thomas Lavery |
| Martin O'Malley |
| Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
| 1:2024cv00195 |
| May 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Lincoln D Almond |
| William E Smith |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Luis A. Pere on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Pere, Luis) |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED.The defendant shall have up to and including 7/16/2024 to enter an appearance and answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff's complaint as outlined in Rule 4 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). (Hill, Cherelle) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Hill, Cherelle) |
| NOTICE to Parties of Right to Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Parties who elect to consent must complete the Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form within 14 days. # Please click here to access the form . Consent to Assignment of Magistrate Judge due by 5/31/2024. (Hill, Cherelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 405.00, receipt number ARIDC-1995667 ), filed by Thomas Lavery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gannon, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
