Perkins v. State of Rhode Island
| Robin L. Perkins |
| State of Rhode Island, Gina Raimondo, RI Department of Human Services, RI Army National Guard, Cranston Police Department and State of RI Department of Corrections |
| 1:2025cv00513 |
| October 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| John J McConnell |
| Amy E Moses |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 3), which requires the Court to determine whether the Complaint states a plausible federal claim for relief. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 667 (2009) (plausible claim standard); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (screening required). The Complaint does not state a plausible federal claim for relief. The Plaintiff alleges federal question jurisdiction, presumably for a denial of civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Statute of Limitations for a 1983 action, or any personal injury action brought in this Court, is generally three years, Riggs v. Curran, 196 F. Supp. 3d 338, 340 (DRI 2016). Here, Mr. Perkins complains about events which occurred in 2019 and 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic and fall outside the three-year statute of limitations. The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED and the IFP Motion is DENIED as moot.So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/18/2026. (Kenny, Meghan)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gina Raimondo, RI Department of Human Services, RI Army National Guard, Cranston Police Department, State of RI Department of Corrections, filed by Robin L. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Hill, Cherelle) |
| Filing 5 REPLY MEMORANDUM re: #4 Order, filed by Robin L. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint: The Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before February 12, 2026. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 12/29/2025. (Simoncelli, Michael)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robin L. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff is directed to produce his Prisoner Account Statement for the last six months by 11/07/2025 or this case may be dismissed. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 10/8/2025. (Kenny, Meghan)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robin L. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Robin L. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Amy E. Moses. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
TEXT ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 3), which requires the Court to determine whether the Complaint states a plausible federal claim for relief. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 667 (2009) (plausible claim standard); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (screening required). The Complaint does not state a plausible federal claim for relief. The Plaintiff alleges federal question jurisdiction, presumably for a denial of civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The Statute of Limitations for a 1983 action, or any personal injury action brought in this Court, is generally three years, Riggs v. Curran, 196 F. Supp. 3d 338, 340 (DRI 2016). Here, Mr. Perkins complains about events which occurred in 2019 and 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic and fall outside the three-year statute of limitations. The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED and the IFP Motion is DENIED as moot.So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 3/18/2026. (Kenny, Meghan)