Gallucci v. Bell et al
| Wendy Gallucci |
| Kelley Bell, Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. and John Doe Corporation I |
| Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. |
| Kelley Bell |
| Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. |
| Wendy Gallucci |
| 1:2025cv00528 |
| October 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island |
| Melissa R DuBose |
| Amy E Moses |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY MEMORANDUM re: #14 Response to Order Defendant Primerica Life Insurance Company's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Order. (Magratten, Brooks) Docket text modified on 4/3/2026 to correct ECF 14 title. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Filing 14 Response to Order by Wendy Gallucci re: Text Order Notice of Service Attempts on Kelley Bell. (Robenhymer, Timothy) Docket text modified on 4/3/2026 to match document. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand this case to state court (ECF No. #6 ). To resolve the motion, the Court must first determine whether complete diversity exists between the Plaintiff and Defendants. To date, Plaintiff has been unable to serve Defendant Bell. Once the 90 days to serve the complaint lapsed, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed against Defendant Bell for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff's response indicates that she has made efforts to serve Defendant Bell at last known addresses in a few states but has been unsuccessful so far. Plaintiff includes a request for an additional 60 days in which to serve Defendant Bell. The Court is granting this request. If proof of service is not returned by April 3, 2026, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a notice and declaration on the docket detailing the specific efforts made to locate and serve Defendant Bell. So Ordered by District Judge Melissa R. DuBose on 2/2/2026. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. re #12 Notice (Other) Plaintiff's Response to Show Cause Order. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Wendy Gallucci re Order, Response to Show Cause Order (Robenhymer, Timothy) |
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed against Defendant Bell for lack of prosecution. Responses due on or before January 29, 2026. So Ordered by District Judge Melissa R. DuBose on 1/15/2026. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY MEMORANDUM In Support of Motion to Remand. (Robenhymer, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 Reply to Counterclaim by Wendy Gallucci. (Robenhymer, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE In Opposition to #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc.. Replies due by 11/21/2025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Stephen Quartino)(Magratten, Brooks) |
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Reset Deadlines re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court: Responses due by 11/17/2025. So Ordered by District Judge Melissa R. DuBose on 11/10/2025. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for an Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc.. Responses due by 11/20/2025. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Kelley Bell, COUNTERCLAIM against Wendy Gallucci by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc..(Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Wendy Gallucci. Responses due by 11/10/2025. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Exhibit to Memorandum)(Robenhymer, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Primerica, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc., Other Affiliate Primerica Life Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC for Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc... (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORD received electronically from the State of Rhode Island. (Hill, Cherelle) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/16/2025) (Hill, Cherelle). |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION (answer to Complaint due October 31, 2025) filed by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc.. (Magratten, Brooks) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Filing 1 NEW CASE/NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Providence County Superior Court, Case Number PC-2025-04704. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ARIDC-2195651, filed by Primerica Brokerage Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Magratten, Brooks) CLERK'S NOTE: Remote electronic access to Exhibit State Court Pleadings has been restricted by the Clerk's Office 10/14/2025 as it contains one or more personal identifier. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Melissa R. DuBose and Magistrate Judge Amy E. Moses. (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
TEXT ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand this case to state court (ECF No. #6 ). To resolve the motion, the Court must first determine whether complete diversity exists between the Plaintiff and Defendants. To date, Plaintiff has been unable to serve Defendant Bell. Once the 90 days to serve the complaint lapsed, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed against Defendant Bell for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff's response indicates that she has made efforts to serve Defendant Bell at last known addresses in a few states but has been unsuccessful so far. Plaintiff includes a request for an additional 60 days in which to serve Defendant Bell. The Court is granting this request. If proof of service is not returned by April 3, 2026, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a notice and declaration on the docket detailing the specific efforts made to locate and serve Defendant Bell. So Ordered by District Judge Melissa R. DuBose on 2/2/2026. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra)